Am I the only one upset because they said the raffle wouldnt have retired and exclusive items every week, but so far it has, and its been 4 times already?
Flight Rising Discussion
Discuss everything and anything Flight Rising.
TOPIC | Roundsey outrage
Am I the only one upset because they said the raffle wouldnt have retired and exclusive items every week, but so far it has, and its been 4 times already?
I'm not, lol. If we were just getting flowerfalls and baldwin stuffs, what fun would that be?
I'm not, lol. If we were just getting flowerfalls and baldwin stuffs, what fun would that be?
|
000000000000000
|
Cis/She/They
rollover at 3:00 AM for me On mobile often Mostly inactive |
|
They never said that they wouldn't have retired items weekly. They simply said the number wouldn't "increase the current available count of any given item by even 1%"
They never said that they wouldn't have retired items weekly. They simply said the number wouldn't "increase the current available count of any given item by even 1%"
[quote name="Jessyta" date="2018-09-12 10:52:54" ]
They never said that they wouldn't have retired items weekly. They simply said the number wouldn't "increase the current available count of any given item by even 1%"
[/quote]
this. And the Skycat was donated, so there's no problem with that. They never stated there wouldn't be retired items in the raffles, they only said something along the lines of KS items would have to be donated from staff play accounts or family accounts, and imp scrolls/g1 imps would not be added to the raffles.
Jessyta wrote on 2018-09-12 10:52:54:
They never said that they wouldn't have retired items weekly. They simply said the number wouldn't "increase the current available count of any given item by even 1%"
this. And the Skycat was donated, so there's no problem with that. They never stated there wouldn't be retired items in the raffles, they only said something along the lines of KS items would have to be donated from staff play accounts or family accounts, and imp scrolls/g1 imps would not be added to the raffles.
Can we point out also how long it'll take to get back to an item they've already given away. Like... Really. It's not going to cause any issues. 10 shadow sprites. If they gave away a Sprite a month, (which they probably won't) it'd a year before we got back to Shadow sprites again. With a significant increase of players. It's fine.
Can we point out also how long it'll take to get back to an item they've already given away. Like... Really. It's not going to cause any issues. 10 shadow sprites. If they gave away a Sprite a month, (which they probably won't) it'd a year before we got back to Shadow sprites again. With a significant increase of players. It's fine.
•I no longer play, but that's left of my lair is not for sale•
I think it’s just a way to get players to spend lots right off the bat. Raffles in most games are meant to take money permanently out of circulation, so this was a genius way of achieving that very quickly.
I think it’s just a way to get players to spend lots right off the bat. Raffles in most games are meant to take money permanently out of circulation, so this was a genius way of achieving that very quickly.
Any pronoun|FR +0|I like dragons
I think it's fine. It's not like they are giving tons of the same retired item away at once. Huge playerbase but tiny number of items reintroduced equals a stable economy and exciting raffle prizes. I don't really get the outrage?
I think it's fine. It's not like they are giving tons of the same retired item away at once. Huge playerbase but tiny number of items reintroduced equals a stable economy and exciting raffle prizes. I don't really get the outrage?
I think the skycat will be a good test. Theoretically as long as there's more value going into the raffle than out, things are ok
If the costs of the raffle tickets bought is less than the worth of the prizes though, it's a potential risk for devaluation of the items. If the staff continues to dump retired items in regardless, it would start to get alarming. So far the previous raffles have been fine, at least in terms of item values
If the costs of the raffle tickets bought is less than the worth of the prizes though, it's a potential risk for devaluation of the items. If the staff continues to dump retired items in regardless, it would start to get alarming. So far the previous raffles have been fine, at least in terms of item values
I think the skycat will be a good test. Theoretically as long as there's more value going into the raffle than out, things are ok
If the costs of the raffle tickets bought is less than the worth of the prizes though, it's a potential risk for devaluation of the items. If the staff continues to dump retired items in regardless, it would start to get alarming. So far the previous raffles have been fine, at least in terms of item values
If the costs of the raffle tickets bought is less than the worth of the prizes though, it's a potential risk for devaluation of the items. If the staff continues to dump retired items in regardless, it would start to get alarming. So far the previous raffles have been fine, at least in terms of item values
