So, I was searching for dragons with the same name as my own because of a silly thing I saw off-site and kept running into this when trying to see other dragons named "Glitch".
Also not sure if I'm just supposed to make a new thread on this, but didn't seem to fit anywhere else. Anywhere, here's the error message:
Also happens when searching "litch" and "glitc" and "litc" but not "itch" or "glit", so I'm guessing it's something with "litc"? ("lit" and "itc" both are fine).
That said, I tried "flitch" and "litce" and couldn't reproduce.
The string at the end is the same for every one I tried.
Is this some big joke I'm missing because "glitch"?
So, I was searching for dragons with the same name as my own because of a silly thing I saw off-site and kept running into this when trying to see other dragons named "Glitch".
Also not sure if I'm just supposed to make a new thread on this, but didn't seem to fit anywhere else. Anywhere, here's the error message:
Also happens when searching "litch" and "glitc" and "litc" but not "itch" or "glit", so I'm guessing it's something with "litc"? ("lit" and "itc" both are fine).
That said, I tried "flitch" and "litce" and couldn't reproduce.
The string at the end is the same for every one I tried.
Is this some big joke I'm missing because "glitch"?
i never know what to put in signatures
@
Christina There was something similar to this a while back-- there's likely a glitchy dragon on the first page of results for that particular combo of letters!
@
Christina There was something similar to this a while back-- there's likely a glitchy dragon on the first page of results for that particular combo of letters!
Okay, so because I had nothing better to do I've figured out (through the process of elimination) that our problem dragon is a non exalted female mirror with a 6-digit ID, 2+ generation, triple basic silver/lavender/jade shadow dragon with common eyes.
Hopefully this helps sort out the bug!
Okay, so because I had nothing better to do I've figured out (through the process of elimination) that our problem dragon is a non exalted female mirror with a 6-digit ID, 2+ generation, triple basic silver/lavender/jade shadow dragon with common eyes.
Hopefully this helps sort out the bug!
UTC +10/11
She/Her
[quote name="@SevenEggs" date="2020-05-31 10:03:19" ]
Okay, so because I had nothing better to do I've figured out (through the process of elimination) that our problem dragon is a non exalted female mirror with a 6-digit ID, 2+ generation, triple basic silver/lavender/jade shadow dragon with common eyes.
Quote:
https://www1.flightrising.com/search/dragons
Trying to get property 'nrg_now' of non-object (View: /home/flightri/laravel/app/views/search/dragons.blade.php) in /8f32454531f8e973d226ced51b746fed Line 127
Hopefully this helps sort out the bug!
[/quote]
How did you find that Dragon!? I searched this dragon with given information and I received the above error. (I mean I cannot see that dragon with that error)
I assume there is an empty-undefined value in dragon's data that server cannot execute the code with that value.
[quote name="@christina" date="2020-03-27 23:31:15" ]
Is this some big joke I'm missing because "glitch"?
[/quote]
No, but because of the reason i mentioned above.
Okay, so because I had nothing better to do I've figured out (through the process of elimination) that our problem dragon is a non exalted female mirror with a 6-digit ID, 2+ generation, triple basic silver/lavender/jade shadow dragon with common eyes.
Quote:
https://www1.flightrising.com/search/dragons
Trying to get property 'nrg_now' of non-object (View: /home/flightri/laravel/app/views/search/dragons.blade.php) in /8f32454531f8e973d226ced51b746fed Line 127
Hopefully this helps sort out the bug!
How did you find that Dragon!? I searched this dragon with given information and I received the above error. (I mean I cannot see that dragon with that error)
I assume there is an empty-undefined value in dragon's data that server cannot execute the code with that value.
Is this some big joke I'm missing because "glitch"?
No, but because of the reason i mentioned above.
He/They