[center][img]https://i.imgur.com/6lIDk8L.png[/img][/center]
From left to right: Fae Spiral Skydancer Tundra Pearlcatcher Wildclaw Mirror Snapper Nocturne Bogsneak Coatl Guardian Ridgeback Imperial
Feel free to point out inaccuracies
It was made using [url=https://emcall.github.io/dragonsizes/]this website[/url] (click the text that says "this website")
There is no human in this size comparison, sorry
EDIT: I forgot to mention, Bogsneaks are broken with this tool, it doesn't show their wingspans.
From left to right: Fae Spiral Skydancer Tundra Pearlcatcher Wildclaw Mirror Snapper Nocturne Bogsneak Coatl Guardian Ridgeback Imperial
Feel free to point out inaccuracies
It was made using
this website (click the text that says "this website")
There is no human in this size comparison, sorry
EDIT: I forgot to mention, Bogsneaks are broken with this tool, it doesn't show their wingspans.
The fae looks so tiny... this is great!
The fae looks so tiny... this is great!
Art shop Ich bin ein Berliner!
17, speech and debate LD captain, US high school senior
Imperial & Fae pairs... HOW?!?
Imperial & Fae pairs... HOW?!?
Except that size tool is misleading because the silhouettes of most of the breeds are poorly proportioned and don't accurately follow the FR artwork.
As a result they look less long and more massive, the larger breeds having more mistakes than some of the smaller ones.
OP did a good a good job with the tools used though!
Edited to be less angery sounding
Except that size tool is misleading because the silhouettes of most of the breeds are poorly proportioned and don't accurately follow the FR artwork.
As a result they look less long and more massive, the larger breeds having more mistakes than some of the smaller ones.
OP did a good a good job with the tools used though!
Edited to be less angery sounding
[quote name="Ankokou" date="2018-08-14 17:41:17" ]
Except that size tool is misleading because the silhouettes of most of the breeds are poorly proportioned and fail to accurately represent the FR artwork.
As a result they look less long and more massive, the larger breeds being some of the worst.
I can't even tell if there is user error on your part because that tool is so inaccurate on it's own.
[/quote]
The silhouettes seem mostly accurate, especially looking at most on site drawings (npcs, ect)
The only major mistake I see is the wing position on imps.
Ankokou wrote on 2018-08-14 17:41:17:
Except that size tool is misleading because the silhouettes of most of the breeds are poorly proportioned and fail to accurately represent the FR artwork.
As a result they look less long and more massive, the larger breeds being some of the worst.
I can't even tell if there is user error on your part because that tool is so inaccurate on it's own.
The silhouettes seem mostly accurate, especially looking at most on site drawings (npcs, ect)
The only major mistake I see is the wing position on imps.
I hope you're having a great day•buy the pretty dragon
[quote name="Izakadu" date="2018-08-14 18:14:20" ]
[quote name="Ankokou" date="2018-08-14 17:41:17" ]
Except that size tool is misleading because the silhouettes of most of the breeds are poorly proportioned and fail to accurately represent the FR artwork.
As a result they look less long and more massive, the larger breeds being some of the worst.
I can't even tell if there is user error on your part because that tool is so inaccurate on it's own.
[/quote]
The silhouettes seem mostly accurate, especially looking at most on site drawings (npcs, ect)
The only major mistake I see is the wing position on imps.
[/quote]
Exactly, the tool forms the silhouettes based on the numbers put in. So if your snapper is really long with a tiny wingspan, that's how she shows up.
Izakadu wrote on 2018-08-14 18:14:20:
Ankokou wrote on 2018-08-14 17:41:17:
Except that size tool is misleading because the silhouettes of most of the breeds are poorly proportioned and fail to accurately represent the FR artwork.
As a result they look less long and more massive, the larger breeds being some of the worst.
I can't even tell if there is user error on your part because that tool is so inaccurate on it's own.
The silhouettes seem mostly accurate, especially looking at most on site drawings (npcs, ect)
The only major mistake I see is the wing position on imps.
Exactly, the tool forms the silhouettes based on the numbers put in. So if your snapper is really long with a tiny wingspan, that's how she shows up.
Me, who ignores canon sizes for no particular reason: Well, the medallion says that's dumb, so we're not gonna do that!
Me, who ignores canon sizes for no particular reason: Well, the medallion says that's dumb, so we're not gonna do that!
Thb, I love cannon sizes, just because of all the fun lore/world building possibilities.
A city with progressively smaller rooms on each floor of a building? With one small, one bedroom house for an imp living at the bottom, and an entire neighborhood of faes at the top? Amazing.
A skydancer tailor who has to store all of his patterns for guardians and ridgebacks in a big warehouse, because they don’t fit in his shop? Perfect.
An imp who claims to somehow able to use two elements, but actually just has a fae hiding in his mane, helping him con people? Great.
Thb, I love cannon sizes, just because of all the fun lore/world building possibilities.
A city with progressively smaller rooms on each floor of a building? With one small, one bedroom house for an imp living at the bottom, and an entire neighborhood of faes at the top? Amazing.
A skydancer tailor who has to store all of his patterns for guardians and ridgebacks in a big warehouse, because they don’t fit in his shop? Perfect.
An imp who claims to somehow able to use two elements, but actually just has a fae hiding in his mane, helping him con people? Great.
I hope you're having a great day•buy the pretty dragon
@
Izakadu
Not in my opinion, I mean maybe I'm wrong but if you ignore wings and just look at body/neck/tail proportions it looks incorrect on several breeds. Like that imp, on the art the tail is easily 1/3 longer than the body but on that thing they are the same length. The neck to shoulders is as long as the body on the artwork but it looks shorter there and the neck is longer than the antlers on the art but the antlers on that meet the shoulders because it's missing about 1/4th of it's neck. It's scrunched.
Look at how short the guardian's neck is compared to it's skull, not including horns, The neck is the length of it's head. Look at the art, the neck is easily over twice the length of it's skull.
Almost every breed has some major error like this I could nitpick, but I won't.
@
BBean
If it's using a silhouette that is inaccurately proportioned, which it is for several breeds, everything is going to look more massive and bulky since they are scaled wrong.
@
Izakadu
Not in my opinion, I mean maybe I'm wrong but if you ignore wings and just look at body/neck/tail proportions it looks incorrect on several breeds. Like that imp, on the art the tail is easily 1/3 longer than the body but on that thing they are the same length. The neck to shoulders is as long as the body on the artwork but it looks shorter there and the neck is longer than the antlers on the art but the antlers on that meet the shoulders because it's missing about 1/4th of it's neck. It's scrunched.
Look at how short the guardian's neck is compared to it's skull, not including horns, The neck is the length of it's head. Look at the art, the neck is easily over twice the length of it's skull.
Almost every breed has some major error like this I could nitpick, but I won't.
@
BBean
If it's using a silhouette that is inaccurately proportioned, which it is for several breeds, everything is going to look more massive and bulky since they are scaled wrong.
WHY are skydancers so tiny! And how are imperials larger than guardians?!
WHY are skydancers so tiny! And how are imperials larger than guardians?!
