Back

General Discussion

Discuss your favorites: TV shows, music, games and hobbies.
TOPIC | brain is buzzing about httyd again
(this is mostly copy pasted from discord but i need to get the rant out of my system i need interaction about it) [size=4][b]part 1 : Toothless' Design[/b][/size] I was rewatching some clips of the final battle from httyd1, looking for visual references really showing that stabilizing fin in action. Loved that about model 1 Toothless, the prominence of the fins. It's such an excellent detail in his design, tbh. Short and broad wings for immense power generated as quickly as possible allowing for maximum acceleration. The two [i]separated[/i] tail fins which provide [i]some[/i] stability but moreso control and maneuverability at high speeds as they act like a pair of secondary wings, for even sharper roll and yaw. And the stabilizing fin, just like a bird's tail, allowing for even greater stability and control at speed. mmhmhmmhmh its so GOOD [img]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/788713255602356226/967290954220470323/werwerwerwer.jpg[/img] [img]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/788713255602356226/967291907636068372/wre4564jg.jpg[/img]| [size=4][b]part 2 : Slow[/b][/size] i jsut realized something that made the sequels feel really off to me. Toothless never feels fast in the sequels night furies thats their thing! they are stealthy and they're fast, the design sells it perfectly i mean for F@KS sake the way they attack is exactly like peregrine falcons. they don't need brutal strength or razor sharp talons because what they do is divebomb their targets, using their fire blasts more to stun than to incinerate. [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73OvZ_l35Sw]this[/url] is everyone's favorite example for a reason. when aiming for larger prey at least. [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KNHoFheA2A]Final Battle httyd1[/url] [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dca3t2dRFbM&t=28s]Final Chase httyd3[/url] just. compare the two. They're moving at a f@king snail's pace in 3. I can imagine the light fury being slower as they're adapted more to hunting around the ocean and so may have lost some of the sheer acceleration out of a lack of need (the blunter ends of fins and wings give that impression, it produces more drag) but given how closely related they are as species the difference can't be that great. I even remember thinking while watching the chase in httyd3.. why aren't they outspeeding the bulky heavy deathgrippers with ease? Weaving through the mountains (which is apparently what's keeping him from catching up) doesn't even need to be a thing at all, make the mountains too far away to be viable, the ACTUAL issue is that they cant fire at her without hurting her, the mountains doesnt need to be a thing. and also why are they so close to the ground in the first place? put them in the sky, they are sky dragons. Keep the rest of it ig but just go faster >:0 How about Toothless does the lightning cloaking because he and hiccup are As One (established in 2, like cloudjumper and valka) or just because he's smart and knows it will work (letting him have agency again). The noise and the flash of light distracts grimmel, allowing him to flex that, because of his adaptations, he's faster than nubless when he's trying to be. continue as normal. [size=4][b]part 3 : Light Fury Re/Design[/b][/size] I keep seeing these outlandish redesigns of the light fury and its funny and frustrating that not a single one of them appears to consider anything but aesthetic. you gotta think about adaptation and fitness, because the actual designers did and that's what gives the [b]dragons[/b] their [i][b]realism and believability[/b][/i], you can't cut it on looks alone. At least understand why the light fury looks the way she does before trying to change it. it's not a bunch of feminine anthropomorphic stereotypes (this time). She has large eyes because she's a cousin species to the night fury who also has large eyes because they are based on birds of prey. (Toothless has [url=https://www.reddit.com/r/httyd/comments/qasmwo/toothless_head_comparison_by_durkishdragon/]changed[/url] a lot). She has a large round forehead because she is uniquely based on the beluga whale and their sonar, an adaptation that would make their easier mode of cloaking via heat even more effective, they're even stealthier, but during the day time, when a dragon as small as them would be otherwise quite vulnerable. Their natural coloration helps them blend in the clouds and sky, very common in the ocean, their seemingly preferred habitat given their presence in the hidden world. She has small hands because she doesn't need large claws for grappling. I assume that they also make use of the iconic dive but less dramatically, more like a pelican stunning fish to scoop up. the white color also helps her prolong avoiding detection from below, the same way marine animals do. perhaps she uses that hypothetical sonar to scout for schools of fish while hiding in the clouds where the fish and larger can's see her idk point is, her design is good actually, eat dirt. i didnt like it either until i like. bothered to think about it from an ecological perspective [img]https://c.tenor.com/Rx82tun9QUUAAAAd/toothless-light-fury.gif[/img] she is good and i love her also male light furies literally exist in the movie [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhhsYu58fMk]lmao [/url] edit: this [url=https://alwaysahiccupandastrid.tumblr.com/post/188951423072/piplupcola-the-light-fury-is-not-a-female-night]post[/url]! [rule] listen httyd has been in my brain since i was a wee lad. my autism grabbed onto this franchise with both hands and has refused to let go ever since. you must understand my brain is full of the soundtracks on loop permanently and i love it
(this is mostly copy pasted from discord but i need to get the rant out of my system i need interaction about it)

part 1 : Toothless' Design

I was rewatching some clips of the final battle from httyd1, looking for visual references really showing that stabilizing fin in action. Loved that about model 1 Toothless, the prominence of the fins. It's such an excellent detail in his design, tbh. Short and broad wings for immense power generated as quickly as possible allowing for maximum acceleration. The two separated tail fins which provide some stability but moreso control and maneuverability at high speeds as they act like a pair of secondary wings, for even sharper roll and yaw. And the stabilizing fin, just like a bird's tail, allowing for even greater stability and control at speed. mmhmhmmhmh its so GOOD

werwerwerwer.jpg
wre4564jg.jpg|

part 2 : Slow

i jsut realized something that made the sequels feel really off to me. Toothless never feels fast in the sequels
night furies thats their thing! they are stealthy and they're fast, the design sells it perfectly i mean for F@KS sake the way they attack is exactly like peregrine falcons. they don't need brutal strength or razor sharp talons because what they do is divebomb their targets, using their fire blasts more to stun than to incinerate. this is everyone's favorite example for a reason. when aiming for larger prey at least.

Final Battle httyd1
Final Chase httyd3
just. compare the two. They're moving at a f@king snail's pace in 3. I can imagine the light fury being slower as they're adapted more to hunting around the ocean and so may have lost some of the sheer acceleration out of a lack of need (the blunter ends of fins and wings give that impression, it produces more drag) but given how closely related they are as species the difference can't be that great.

I even remember thinking while watching the chase in httyd3.. why aren't they outspeeding the bulky heavy deathgrippers with ease?

Weaving through the mountains (which is apparently what's keeping him from catching up) doesn't even need to be a thing at all, make the mountains too far away to be viable, the ACTUAL issue is that they cant fire at her without hurting her, the mountains doesnt need to be a thing. and also why are they so close to the ground in the first place? put them in the sky, they are sky dragons. Keep the rest of it ig but just go faster >:0
How about Toothless does the lightning cloaking because he and hiccup are As One (established in 2, like cloudjumper and valka) or just because he's smart and knows it will work (letting him have agency again). The noise and the flash of light distracts grimmel, allowing him to flex that, because of his adaptations, he's faster than nubless when he's trying to be. continue as normal.

part 3 : Light Fury Re/Design

I keep seeing these outlandish redesigns of the light fury and its funny and frustrating that not a single one of them appears to consider anything but aesthetic. you gotta think about adaptation and fitness, because the actual designers did and that's what gives the dragons their realism and believability, you can't cut it on looks alone. At least understand why the light fury looks the way she does before trying to change it. it's not a bunch of feminine anthropomorphic stereotypes (this time).

She has large eyes because she's a cousin species to the night fury who also has large eyes because they are based on birds of prey. (Toothless has changed a lot). She has a large round forehead because she is uniquely based on the beluga whale and their sonar, an adaptation that would make their easier mode of cloaking via heat even more effective, they're even stealthier, but during the day time, when a dragon as small as them would be otherwise quite vulnerable. Their natural coloration helps them blend in the clouds and sky, very common in the ocean, their seemingly preferred habitat given their presence in the hidden world. She has small hands because she doesn't need large claws for grappling. I assume that they also make use of the iconic dive but less dramatically, more like a pelican stunning fish to scoop up. the white color also helps her prolong avoiding detection from below, the same way marine animals do. perhaps she uses that hypothetical sonar to scout for schools of fish while hiding in the clouds where the fish and larger can's see her idk
point is, her design is good actually, eat dirt. i didnt like it either until i like. bothered to think about it from an ecological perspective
toothless-light-fury.gif
she is good and i love her
also male light furies literally exist in the movie lmao
edit: this post!


listen httyd has been in my brain since i was a wee lad. my autism grabbed onto this franchise with both hands and has refused to let go ever since. you must understand my brain is full of the soundtracks on loop permanently and i love it
dBieivA.png
eIK5iG7.png
ePOliyb.png
bYt72YT.png
xj6Mn2e.png
A Bottomless Curse,
A Bottomless Sea
Accepting of
All that there Is
And can Be
...................................
65911250.png
WbuVpYC.png
That's really interesting I didn't notice the speed changes specifically I just knew something bothered me!

Good point on the light fury design but what do you think about how much Toothless has changed? I think a lot of the changes to Toothless are a bit strange idk.
That's really interesting I didn't notice the speed changes specifically I just knew something bothered me!

Good point on the light fury design but what do you think about how much Toothless has changed? I think a lot of the changes to Toothless are a bit strange idk.
NFJCNCS.gif UBaiWUV.png
bYt72YT.png
rUoKR6y.png
YMPbu9R.png
BY1bl09.png ZFAfDzf.png eVSz2yG.png
@Doodlepede

I really don’t want this to sound aggressive, I just get excited at talking about creature design. Please tell me if I accidentally sounded to blunt or anything.

Since I’m curious to hear from a perspective other than my own, would you mind a friendly debate about the Light Fury’s creature design? From my own pov (admittedly with my own biases, I dislike the changes to Toothless), her design doesn’t make sense from an ecological perspective, so I’d like to discuss it without any salt, since I feel like the other attempts I’ve had talking about it have gone Dead Sea salinity.
I have my own opinions on the concept art book explanation of “She needed to be graceful and delicate bc she’s female” but that’s not the point of this discussion, so ignore my ramble in the cut-through text.


Anyways help, I’ve been listening to nothing except the Httyd 1 soundtrack and the Hades soundtrack for the past day.
@Doodlepede

I really don’t want this to sound aggressive, I just get excited at talking about creature design. Please tell me if I accidentally sounded to blunt or anything.

Since I’m curious to hear from a perspective other than my own, would you mind a friendly debate about the Light Fury’s creature design? From my own pov (admittedly with my own biases, I dislike the changes to Toothless), her design doesn’t make sense from an ecological perspective, so I’d like to discuss it without any salt, since I feel like the other attempts I’ve had talking about it have gone Dead Sea salinity.
I have my own opinions on the concept art book explanation of “She needed to be graceful and delicate bc she’s female” but that’s not the point of this discussion, so ignore my ramble in the cut-through text.


Anyways help, I’ve been listening to nothing except the Httyd 1 soundtrack and the Hades soundtrack for the past day.
Call me Requacy (Pinging Allowed!)(Note to self: Make art for signature)
I'm just glad to see someone else likes the light fury. Everyone's always complaining about her. Though I actually don't care about any of the "ecology" stuff, I just like my fair princess sparkle dragon.

And I think the way she disappears, using her fire to superheat her scales, is such a cool and unique idea.

I was disappointed with the night light coloring though. I have the art book and there were so many cool ideas in there, I don't know why they just made them look like tux kittens. Maybe because the toys are easy to make, I dunno.
I'm just glad to see someone else likes the light fury. Everyone's always complaining about her. Though I actually don't care about any of the "ecology" stuff, I just like my fair princess sparkle dragon.

And I think the way she disappears, using her fire to superheat her scales, is such a cool and unique idea.

I was disappointed with the night light coloring though. I have the art book and there were so many cool ideas in there, I don't know why they just made them look like tux kittens. Maybe because the toys are easy to make, I dunno.
lF5nfl9.png tShJXZX.png
On your note about their eyes being based on birds of prey, I stopped a moment to wonder why they have slitted pupils. This is usually a trait for animals that are close to the ground or exposed to changes in light level. With the latter, we have night furies, okay. Those are nocturnal.

But what about the light fury? Well, there is one genus of bird, with only three species, that has slitted pupils. Why? They hunt for fish, close to the surface, and need that adaptation to protect their eyes against glare on the water. They also have other REALLY odd adaptations, but that is neither here nor there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rynchops
Anyway, it makes perfect sense for fish eaters to have eyes like that, even the diurnal ones.


And yes, someone else who loves that amazing stabilizer action. A little pet peeve of mine is that many flying fantasy creatures look unrealistic for their lack of one. Looking at you, Flight Rising.
It's so good to see such realistic and dynamic flight like in the first movie (can't speak much for the later ones, have only seen them once)
On your note about their eyes being based on birds of prey, I stopped a moment to wonder why they have slitted pupils. This is usually a trait for animals that are close to the ground or exposed to changes in light level. With the latter, we have night furies, okay. Those are nocturnal.

But what about the light fury? Well, there is one genus of bird, with only three species, that has slitted pupils. Why? They hunt for fish, close to the surface, and need that adaptation to protect their eyes against glare on the water. They also have other REALLY odd adaptations, but that is neither here nor there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rynchops
Anyway, it makes perfect sense for fish eaters to have eyes like that, even the diurnal ones.


And yes, someone else who loves that amazing stabilizer action. A little pet peeve of mine is that many flying fantasy creatures look unrealistic for their lack of one. Looking at you, Flight Rising.
It's so good to see such realistic and dynamic flight like in the first movie (can't speak much for the later ones, have only seen them once)
[quote name="@brighteningskies" date="2022-04-22 23:16:46" ] What do you think about how much Toothless has changed? I think a lot of the changes to Toothless are a bit strange idk. [/quote] i had written up a beautiful response day-of but unfortunately i took too long, tried to submit at 12:04 and the whole thing got deleted. It's left me kinda bitter about it which is why i haven't responded till now. s. m. h. hate it. he's changed pretty [url=https://www.reddit.com/r/httyd/comments/qasmwo/toothless_head_comparison_by_durkishdragon/]dramatically[/url] i'd say, though it is all in the details. Personally, model 1 is my favorite. he's absolutely adorable and totally fearsome. Really what i hate most is how his enitre body of behaviour has changed. while I know 10 years of captivity will change the behaviour of any animal, he was already [url=https://youtu.be/6_eBGV71X0w?list=PLZbXA4lyCtqq30AzMLNzUaqe5y-h2cWnK&t=102]15[/url] when he was caught! that's a lot of life experience that should be hard wired, even if he is intelligent enough to determine that not all humans are bad. in the first movie, he acts like a wild animal, and that's what I love most. He's instantly mistrustful of any human that isn't hiccup, and that makes sense! they [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS4dJNwTIfU]approach[/url] with [url=https://youtu.be/aFnS18LM8Ws?t=146]aggression[/url], he reacts with aggression, held at hand only by his love and devotion for hiccup. There's something so Sharp about him that we never really see again in the sequels, and i miss it a lot. All these little mannerisms that make him so believeable. he's not a goofy funny dog/cat, he's a [i]dragon[/i], a wild animal. It's [url=https://youtu.be/c95YKkIbTGg?list=PLZbXA4lyCtqq7n00S9RXbFvAfbqAuZPRu&t=113]THIS[/url] and [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5JHOYmfPpo]THIS[/url] and [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFnS18LM8Ws&t=134s]THIS[/url] and especially[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHXVvD4FFas] THIS[/url] It's what makes the journey of 1 so compelling. it isn't that dragons aren't deadly and dangerous, it's that they aren't evil. When Hiccupt said [url=https://youtu.be/ikZskBxcr1w?list=PLQYxGOrIgxy2cv0uhZR-nwCkroycK5eKy&t=8]this[/url], he meant that their perception that dragons are mindless killing machines is wrong, that they're actually intelligent and empathetic, not that they're actually goofy gentle giants. (ALSO YO HOLY SHID I NEVER SAW THE FORESHADOWING [url=https://youtu.be/ikZskBxcr1w?list=PLQYxGOrIgxy2cv0uhZR-nwCkroycK5eKy&t=34]here[/url] and [url=https://youtu.be/WCWlHQfoepc?list=PLQYxGOrIgxy2cv0uhZR-nwCkroycK5eKy&t=261]here[/url] for [url=https://youtu.be/HKfGgAijrBU?list=PLQYxGOrIgxy2cv0uhZR-nwCkroycK5eKy&t=180]this[/url] MAN this movie is brilliant) they cute-d up an already adorable and excellent design, making him... sorta doughy. its tolerable in 2, it's fine but it's just awful in 3. i'm glad he got his agency back in 3 but holy moly did they really need to do dumb garbage like [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCHoWsMt0LY]this[/url] just all of this? come ON he's already cute and funny without needing to be stupid and almost 4th wall breaking. knock it off movie. 3 actually had a [b]lot[/b] of obnoxious in it that i just surgically remove from my memory after each watch, preventing me from hating it. i fooking hate the 'teens'. they were fun in 1 and the annoying is easily explained by the fact that they're dumb teens but bruh they are adults now [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6YTq-3hmnA]shut up[/url]. words cannot describe how much i hate the snotlout valka thing. this is [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1dyNhnHVaw]all[/url] just. so not funny. httyd1 is funny in a dreamworks way. stop being borderline illumination funny. its awful. lol i got off topic as hell. @ httyd3: [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEqgJEkdIZI]stop being all of that[/url]
@brighteningskies wrote on 2022-04-22 23:16:46:
What do you think about how much Toothless has changed? I think a lot of the changes to Toothless are a bit strange idk.
i had written up a beautiful response day-of but unfortunately i took too long, tried to submit at 12:04 and the whole thing got deleted. It's left me kinda bitter about it which is why i haven't responded till now. s. m. h.

hate it. he's changed pretty dramatically i'd say, though it is all in the details. Personally, model 1 is my favorite. he's absolutely adorable and totally fearsome. Really what i hate most is how his enitre body of behaviour has changed. while I know 10 years of captivity will change the behaviour of any animal, he was already 15 when he was caught! that's a lot of life experience that should be hard wired, even if he is intelligent enough to determine that not all humans are bad.

in the first movie, he acts like a wild animal, and that's what I love most. He's instantly mistrustful of any human that isn't hiccup, and that makes sense! they approach with aggression, he reacts with aggression, held at hand only by his love and devotion for hiccup. There's something so Sharp about him that we never really see again in the sequels, and i miss it a lot. All these little mannerisms that make him so believeable. he's not a goofy funny dog/cat, he's a dragon, a wild animal. It's THIS and THIS and THIS and especially THIS

It's what makes the journey of 1 so compelling. it isn't that dragons aren't deadly and dangerous, it's that they aren't evil. When Hiccupt said this, he meant that their perception that dragons are mindless killing machines is wrong, that they're actually intelligent and empathetic, not that they're actually goofy gentle giants. (ALSO YO HOLY SHID I NEVER SAW THE FORESHADOWING here and here for this MAN this movie is brilliant)

they cute-d up an already adorable and excellent design, making him... sorta doughy. its tolerable in 2, it's fine but it's just awful in 3. i'm glad he got his agency back in 3 but holy moly did they really need to do dumb garbage like this just all of this? come ON he's already cute and funny without needing to be stupid and almost 4th wall breaking. knock it off movie. 3 actually had a lot of obnoxious in it that i just surgically remove from my memory after each watch, preventing me from hating it. i fooking hate the 'teens'. they were fun in 1 and the annoying is easily explained by the fact that they're dumb teens but bruh they are adults now shut up. words cannot describe how much i hate the snotlout valka thing. this is all just. so not funny. httyd1 is funny in a dreamworks way. stop being borderline illumination funny. its awful. lol i got off topic as hell. @ httyd3: stop being all of that
dBieivA.png
eIK5iG7.png
ePOliyb.png
bYt72YT.png
xj6Mn2e.png
A Bottomless Curse,
A Bottomless Sea
Accepting of
All that there Is
And can Be
...................................
65911250.png
WbuVpYC.png
Dragons aside, the thing about httyd1 that really captivated me is that Hiccup starts out as a pathetic little guy, but becomes a hero thanks to his empathy, determination, and cleverness. It's a very David-vs-Goliath kind of story. The fact that subsequent movies turned Hiccup into a generic action hero who wins the day by being the Special Dragon Man is such a disservice to his character.
Dragons aside, the thing about httyd1 that really captivated me is that Hiccup starts out as a pathetic little guy, but becomes a hero thanks to his empathy, determination, and cleverness. It's a very David-vs-Goliath kind of story. The fact that subsequent movies turned Hiccup into a generic action hero who wins the day by being the Special Dragon Man is such a disservice to his character.
09070661-F9A3-4D5F-AE78-35EBF843F64C.png
I’m not going to go on a full rant about it, but YES FINALLY someone who loves some good flight physics. When I see some aspect of flight animated well it makes me happy, and movie 1 Toothless looked so fast and agile. He moved like a fighter jet and I loved it! His flight actually looked believable (it still isn’t possible for a variety of reasons), but it LOOKED real

I don’t know if becoming a pilot made me start picking apart flight in everything from “Hollywood not understanding airplanes” to “this flying creature doesn’t have the right wing loading to physically fly :(“ but sometimes I gotta suspend my disbelief, lol. As an aside, the fact you used the terms roll and yaw specifically fills me with utter glee
I’m not going to go on a full rant about it, but YES FINALLY someone who loves some good flight physics. When I see some aspect of flight animated well it makes me happy, and movie 1 Toothless looked so fast and agile. He moved like a fighter jet and I loved it! His flight actually looked believable (it still isn’t possible for a variety of reasons), but it LOOKED real

I don’t know if becoming a pilot made me start picking apart flight in everything from “Hollywood not understanding airplanes” to “this flying creature doesn’t have the right wing loading to physically fly :(“ but sometimes I gotta suspend my disbelief, lol. As an aside, the fact you used the terms roll and yaw specifically fills me with utter glee
unknown.png
@St0rmbringer hihii >He moved like a fighter jet i was debating whether I wanted to add this too since it was part of my rant on discord but decided against it because the post was already getting too long for my liking buttt since i now know [i]someone[/i] will appreciate it.. [img]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/788713255602356226/969032836399112232/wwejrwjerjwje.jpg[/img] see it see it see it see it (i know you see it) the wings and the stabilizing fin and the rudder, and i picked that image instead of a [i]much[/i] nerdier one. obviously he handles like an F-117 (my beloved) or the much more recent [img]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/788713255602356226/969069840784580608/234wregdghjtr5e4w.jpg[/img] F-35 at the time i had to exercise so much restraint in not getting into a tangent about how exactly those design elements would affect flight yknow how the dfferent shapes produced in the wake will cause certain affects and that's why falcon wings are pointy and sharp (which i brieeeefly mention abt the light fury and her rounder edges in all her fins and wings - it would ultimately make her slower because the rounder edges necessarily produce more drag)(if i had designed toothless i would have made the wings EVEN pointier) yknow all that stuff, and why certain other designs in the same series really bother me (monstrous nightmare what even are your wings) (cloudjumper's tail is too long and flexible for that fletching-shaped fan to function the way it should + the inner pair of wings should be much smaller and thinner and NOT flap to function more like a fish's pelvic fins but i also don't see the actual neccesity for that adaptation. but it is cool as shid so it's forgiveable) > used the terms roll and yaw specifically my father has always been a nerd about aeronautics and mechanics and the like. Aided him well in the air force i'm sure! naturally, I have a lot of exposure because of this. taught me about the bernoullie principle when i was like 7 type beat. it's the mechanics of flight pertaining to animals that i'm more interested in, rather than planes and other manmade things. birds and [i]literally[/i] [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairyfly]microscopic wasps[/url] and fish (aerodynamics is a kind of fluid dynamics obv).
@St0rmbringer hihii
>He moved like a fighter jet

i was debating whether I wanted to add this too since it was part of my rant on discord but decided against it because the post was already getting too long for my liking buttt since i now know someone will appreciate it..
wwejrwjerjwje.jpg see it see it see it see it (i know you see it) the wings and the stabilizing fin and the rudder, and i picked that image instead of a much nerdier one. obviously he handles like an F-117 (my beloved) or the much more recent
234wregdghjtr5e4w.jpg
F-35

at the time i had to exercise so much restraint in not getting into a tangent about how exactly those design elements would affect flight yknow how the dfferent shapes produced in the wake will cause certain affects and that's why falcon wings are pointy and sharp (which i brieeeefly mention abt the light fury and her rounder edges in all her fins and wings - it would ultimately make her slower because the rounder edges necessarily produce more drag)(if i had designed toothless i would have made the wings EVEN pointier) yknow all that stuff, and why certain other designs in the same series really bother me (monstrous nightmare what even are your wings) (cloudjumper's tail is too long and flexible for that fletching-shaped fan to function the way it should + the inner pair of wings should be much smaller and thinner and NOT flap to function more like a fish's pelvic fins but i also don't see the actual neccesity for that adaptation. but it is cool as shid so it's forgiveable)

> used the terms roll and yaw specifically

my father has always been a nerd about aeronautics and mechanics and the like. Aided him well in the air force i'm sure! naturally, I have a lot of exposure because of this. taught me about the bernoullie principle when i was like 7 type beat. it's the mechanics of flight pertaining to animals that i'm more interested in, rather than planes and other manmade things. birds and literally microscopic wasps and fish (aerodynamics is a kind of fluid dynamics obv).
dBieivA.png
eIK5iG7.png
ePOliyb.png
bYt72YT.png
xj6Mn2e.png
A Bottomless Curse,
A Bottomless Sea
Accepting of
All that there Is
And can Be
...................................
65911250.png
WbuVpYC.png
Love this analysis! I watched all of the HTTYD movies and shows as they released growing up so the series is special to me. I didn’t like the third movie much either but more for storytelling reasons. The ending just felt too, stereotypical to me? I don’t know what it is about movies, but sequels are always terrible compared to the first one. There are things I did really enjoy about it though.

Come to think of it, I should probably come up with a more in-depth analysis on why I don’t enjoy the third movie as much. It’s been quite a few years since I watched them though ;;
Love this analysis! I watched all of the HTTYD movies and shows as they released growing up so the series is special to me. I didn’t like the third movie much either but more for storytelling reasons. The ending just felt too, stereotypical to me? I don’t know what it is about movies, but sequels are always terrible compared to the first one. There are things I did really enjoy about it though.

Come to think of it, I should probably come up with a more in-depth analysis on why I don’t enjoy the third movie as much. It’s been quite a few years since I watched them though ;;
pixil-frame-067.png2sdjCmT.pngpixil-frame-068.pngQq78qBr.png