This sound a lil mossy, but how about you give someone that opens a forum post in the Dragon Share the option to limit how many dragons each reply post can link/show. Some just crowd the posts since the like system got more popular even tho the poster just asks for 1 derg
TOPIC | Limit Dragons on Dragon Share forum
This sound a lil mossy, but how about you give someone that opens a forum post in the Dragon Share the option to limit how many dragons each reply post can link/show. Some just crowd the posts since the like system got more popular even tho the poster just asks for 1 derg
How can it be enforced? If you limit the IMG tag used per post, one can simply reply multiple times, or edit the images of all the dragons they want to show into one image then post. There are dozens of ways to 'get around' any restrictions of such, and cause unnecessary restriction to those who would like to follow the rules. No support.
How can it be enforced? If you limit the IMG tag used per post, one can simply reply multiple times, or edit the images of all the dragons they want to show into one image then post. There are dozens of ways to 'get around' any restrictions of such, and cause unnecessary restriction to those who would like to follow the rules. No support.
I think it would be too difficult to write some sort of script to enforce that, even if it can be really annoying for people to post far too many dragons at once.
i think the people that spam the widget are self-defeating if they're spamming for likes, because i can't imagine many people are willing to go through and open every single bio and click every single button. beyond like... the first 5 or so dragons i just don't see it happening enough to make a difference in the counter.
like, we literally have something like 4 nearly identical versions of 'prettiest dragon above you' because folks kept finding more and more abridged ways to play and every single one gained traction because it was easier than the last. (and tbh i do post to all of them depending on how much time i have.)
like, we literally have something like 4 nearly identical versions of 'prettiest dragon above you' because folks kept finding more and more abridged ways to play and every single one gained traction because it was easier than the last. (and tbh i do post to all of them depending on how much time i have.)
i think the people that spam the widget are self-defeating if they're spamming for likes, because i can't imagine many people are willing to go through and open every single bio and click every single button. beyond like... the first 5 or so dragons i just don't see it happening enough to make a difference in the counter.
like, we literally have something like 4 nearly identical versions of 'prettiest dragon above you' because folks kept finding more and more abridged ways to play and every single one gained traction because it was easier than the last. (and tbh i do post to all of them depending on how much time i have.)
like, we literally have something like 4 nearly identical versions of 'prettiest dragon above you' because folks kept finding more and more abridged ways to play and every single one gained traction because it was easier than the last. (and tbh i do post to all of them depending on how much time i have.)
there's no reason to control how people post if they aren't breaking any legitimate forum rules
there's no reason to control how people post if they aren't breaking any legitimate forum rules
[quote name="Naivety" date="2020-08-29 10:07:26" ]
No support. It would be bypassed alot, as people can just post images and link to dragons' profile. Plus if people add hella ton of dragons even tho person asks for only one, they show that they cant read propely.
[/quote]
Yup. However annoying it gets, there's no way to stop people from "cheating" this rule.
Naivety wrote on 2020-08-29 10:07:26:
No support. It would be bypassed alot, as people can just post images and link to dragons' profile. Plus if people add hella ton of dragons even tho person asks for only one, they show that they cant read propely.